data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff457/ff457a10623ed65435cd3d7e3a8c4d8a490c17d4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/78f72/78f72ca5fd15abdd4ba603c6812a9b159bc1f004" alt=""
For what its worth, Missy would probably not be very down with this. I would argue that its more societal rather than religious pressure which is making these women want to re-virginize (pay attention to the final paragraph of that story), which makes me even more adamant that religious leaders stand up and urge their constituents to not support this. I mean far be it for me to stop women from doing what they want with their bodies, but this seems like the type of elective procedure that one would not do if there were no pressure to do it.
I completely agree with this editorial opposing movements wanting to teach "the strengths and weaknesses" of evolution. (Forget the fact that "the weakness" is that its obvious correctness interferes with Judeo-Christian chronologies) The point here isn't even necessarily that evolution is right and believing in something else is wrong. The idea is that scientific inquiry is good.
Apparently, in Zimbabwe, you can not only get arrested for winning the election, but for saying who won the election.
In other news, tension mounts in relations with Iran as Ahmadinejad is really trying to call the bluff of the UN (and the US, for that matter). Chancellor Merkel, despite the photo-ops, is not really aligned with President Bush. Mostly because she favors diplomatic interventions that proceed under the aegis of the UN. The question is, why type of sanctions are likely to have the most efficacy?
1 comment:
Sooo...it's been almost 12 hours, where's your concert review from last night? :)
Post a Comment